Essay

CISG CASE PRESENTATION

CITATIONS TO OTHER ABSTRACTS OF DECISION

English: Unilex database ; [1997] 2 European Current Law, Monthly Digest (London) No. 88 [67] = [1997] European Current Law Yearbook

German: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Internationales und Europäisches Recht (SZIER)/Revue suisse de droit international et de droit européen (1996) 140-141 [cited as 23 January 1995]

Italian: Diritto del Commercio Internazionale (1997) 759 No. 174

Polish: Hermanowski/Jastrzebski, Konwencja Narodow Zjednoczonych o umowach miedzynarodowej sprzedazy towarow (Konwencja wiedenska) - Komentarz (1997) 284-285

CITATIONS TO TEXT OF DECISION

Original language (French): CISG - France website ("http://Witz.jura.uni-sb.de/CISG/decisions/230196v.htm"); CISG online website ("http://www.jura.uni-freiburg.de/ipr1/cisg/urteile/text/159.htm"); Bulletin des arrêts de la Chambre civile de la Cour de Cassation (1996) I, no. 38 [24-25]; Dalloz Sirey (1996) No. 24, 334; Journal du Droit International (1996) 670-671; Revue critique de droit international privé (1996) 460-461; Juris Classeur Périodique (1996) II, 2234 [260]; [1999] Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 126; Unilex database

Translation (English): Text presented below

CITATIONS TO COMMENTS ON DECISION

English: Honnold, Uniform Law for International Sales (1999) 328 [Art. 49]; Koch, Pace Review of Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods (1998) 242 n.219-220 [fundamental breach: frustration of purpose of contract]; Saidov, Damages under the CISG (December 2001) n.200; [2004] S.A. Kruisinga, (Non-)conformity in the 1980 UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: a uniform concept?, Intersentia at 45; [2005] Schlechtriem & Schwenzer ed., Commentary on UN Convention on International Sale of Goods, 2d (English) ed., Oxford University Press, Art. 25 para. 21a Art. 35 para. 9; Henschel, The Conformity of Goods in International Sales, Forlaget Thomson (2005) 157, 212; Spaic, Analysis of Fundamental Breach under the CISG (December 2006) nn.300-301; Peter Huber, CISG: The Structure of Remedies, 71 RabelsZ (2007) n.60

French: Bureau, Revue critique de droit international privé (1996) 462-467; Kahn, Journal du Droit International (1996) 673-674; Leveneur, Juris-Classeur Périodique-CCC (May 1996) 4-5 No. 77; Muir Watt, Juris Classeur Périodique (1996) II, 2234 [461-462]; Witz, Dalloz Sirey (1996) No. 24, 334-338; Witz, Emptio-Venditio Internationales, Neumayer ed. (Basel 1997) 430, 433-435, 443-441, 447-452

German: Schlechtriem, Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 1997, 132; Witz/Wolter, Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft (RIW) 1998, 278 [279-281]

Go to Case Table of Contents

Case text (English translation) [second draft]

Queen Mary Case Translation Programme

Cour de Cassation 23 January 1996
Sacovini S.r.l. v. Société Les Fils de Henri Ramel et al.

Translation by Charles Sant 'Elia [*]

The Court, at the public hearing on 5 December 1995, where were present: Mr. Lemontey, président, Mr. Ancel, conseiller rapporteur, Mr. Renard-Payen, Chartier, Mr. Durieux, conseillers, Mr. Savatier, Mrs. Bignon, conseillers référendaires, Mr. Sainte-Rose, solicitor general, Mrs. Collet, chamber clerk;

On the report of Mr. Ancel, conseiller, the pleadings of Ms. Vincent, attorney for the Sacovini company and Mr. Marrazza, in their separate capacities, and the pleadings of SCP Piwnica

The Best Essay Writing Service - EssayBox.org

et Molinié, attorneys for Les fils de Henri Ramel company, � the briefs of Mr. Sainte-Rose, solicitor general, and after having deliberated pursuant to the law;

On the only grounds of Les fils de Henri Ramel's cross appeal, as stated in the brief and here reproduced:

Whereas the challenges of the appeal, directed against the appellate court to order the Les fils de Henri Ramel company [buyer] to pay the Sacovini company [seller] the price of shipping the wine, clash with the sovereign fact-finding power of the trial court judges who held that the [buyer] did not provide proof of its allegations according to which the delivered and commercialized wine had been adulterated;

And on the sole grounds, raised by the court pursuant to Article 1015 of the new Code of Civil Procedure, on the [seller]'s main appeal, taken in its three prongs:

Whereas the Italian [seller] complains that the challenged judgment (Montpellier, 15 April 1993) wrongfully declared the avoidance of the sales of cases of wine shipped in July 1988 to several French merchants, first, by wrongfully deciding that the existence of a defect affecting the wine constituted a breach of the seller's delivery obligation, then, secondly, that the delivery of a chaptalized wine could not constitute such a failure, then finally that there existed no causal link between the chaptalization of the wine and the alleged damage suffered since it was shown, for certain shipments, that it was the transport conditions which had rendered the wine unfit for consumption;

But whereas an international sale of goods is involved, to which the CISG must be applied, having entered into effect on 1 January 1988 between France and Italy, it is by respecting the provisions of that treaty -- and especially Article 35 -- that the appellate court held that by shipping some chaptalized wine the [seller] did not meet its obligation to deliver goods conforming to the contract; and in addition, by exercising its fact-finding function held that only the manipulation of the wine rendered the wine unfit for consumption, the court legally justified its decision;

FOR THESE REASONS:

The Cour de Cassation rejects the appeal and leaves to each party to pay its costs and expenses.

[...]

FOOTNOTES

* Charles Sant 'Elia has a B.A. in Political Science and Italian Literature from New York University and studied Political Science at the Universitá degli Studi di Firenze. He received his J.D. from Pace University School of Law and is admitted to the Bar of the States of New York and Connecticut.

All translations should be verified by cross-checking against the original text.

Go to Case Table of Contents Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law - Last updated June 19, 2007 Comments/Contributions
Go to Database Directory || Go to CISG Table of Contents || Go to Case Search Form || Go to Bibliography


Category: Research paper

Similar articles: